Tanzania: Court throws out petition...
Source:
Guardian - Tanzania On 8th September 2006, The High Court of Tanzania rejected a petition by human rights activists to declare the customary inheritance law unconstitutional.
A panel of high court judges comprising justices Salum Masati, Augustine Shangwa and Thomas Mihayo, said the court had declined to grant a request by the petitioners, Elizabeth Stephen and Salome Charles, both residents of Shinyanga Region.
The two are widows who claimed to have been denied their rights to inheritance.
Reading the verdict, Justice Thomas Mihayo said, the court admits that the customary inheritance law was flawed and actually discriminates against widows and female children. However, it could no be declared unconstitutional.
”The court declines to grant orders as proposed by the petitioners,” said Justice Thomas Mihayo.
The petitioners had wanted the court to direct the Attorney General to make some necessary amendments on the customary law, pay the cost of denying them their basic and constitutional rights, and finally declare the Customary Law (Declaration Order) N0. 4 of 1963 unconstitutional.
The case was filed by Women Legal Aid Centre (WLAC) on behalf of the petitioners.
On the list of petitioners’ counsel included, Geneviene Kato (lead counsel), Nakazael Lukio Tenga, Julius Ndyanabo, Eugence Mniwasa, Bahame Nyanduga, Alphonce Katemi and Mohamed Tibanyendera. Others are Athanasia Soka, Alex Mgongolwa, Magdalena Rwebangira, Jessie Mngoto, and Maria Kashonda.
The Attonery General was represented by the State Attorney, Mixon Ntimbwa.
Counsel representing the petitioners challenged the constitutionality of the customary laws, saying it denied widows their rights to inherit properties of their deceased husbands, contrary to the country’s Constitution and international human rights conventions.
According to the evidence tendered in court, Sukuma customary laws allowed relatives of the deceased husbands to chase them out of their estates.
The counsel wanted the court to declare the customary laws null and void on the grounds that it discriminated against widows and female children, during the distribution of inheritance property.
The law also offered lions’ shares to boys compared to daughters,in the course of inheritance distribution process .
But justice Mihayo, said there were other remedies through which the affected widows could access their rights, instead of declaring the law unconstitutional.
The court said nullification of the law would create confusion amongst members of different societies because Tanzania has many tribes.
”If the court accepts these proposals, other people from different tribes would file similar cases, challenging their customs,” noted Mihayo.
The court provided options to the petitioners to pursue their cases - submit their proposals to the district councils, which will recommend to the responsible minister to modify a certain customary law.
”If the minister accepts the proposals, he may publish them in the government gazette or make some amendments on the laws to suit public interests,” said Justice Mihayo.
But the petitioners’ counsel said the would appeal. ”We are not satisfied with the ruling; we are going to the Court of Appeal very soon,” said Alex Mgongolwa.
By Judica Tarimo, Guardian, 09/09/06
Reading the verdict, Justice Thomas Mihayo said, the court admits that the customary inheritance law was flawed and actually discriminates against widows and female children. However, it could no be declared unconstitutional.
”The court declines to grant orders as proposed by the petitioners,” said Justice Thomas Mihayo.
The petitioners had wanted the court to direct the Attorney General to make some necessary amendments on the customary law, pay the cost of denying them their basic and constitutional rights, and finally declare the Customary Law (Declaration Order) N0. 4 of 1963 unconstitutional.
The case was filed by Women Legal Aid Centre (WLAC) on behalf of the petitioners.
On the list of petitioners’ counsel included, Geneviene Kato (lead counsel), Nakazael Lukio Tenga, Julius Ndyanabo, Eugence Mniwasa, Bahame Nyanduga, Alphonce Katemi and Mohamed Tibanyendera. Others are Athanasia Soka, Alex Mgongolwa, Magdalena Rwebangira, Jessie Mngoto, and Maria Kashonda.
The Attonery General was represented by the State Attorney, Mixon Ntimbwa.
Counsel representing the petitioners challenged the constitutionality of the customary laws, saying it denied widows their rights to inherit properties of their deceased husbands, contrary to the country’s Constitution and international human rights conventions.
According to the evidence tendered in court, Sukuma customary laws allowed relatives of the deceased husbands to chase them out of their estates.
The counsel wanted the court to declare the customary laws null and void on the grounds that it discriminated against widows and female children, during the distribution of inheritance property.
The law also offered lions’ shares to boys compared to daughters,in the course of inheritance distribution process .
But justice Mihayo, said there were other remedies through which the affected widows could access their rights, instead of declaring the law unconstitutional.
The court said nullification of the law would create confusion amongst members of different societies because Tanzania has many tribes.
”If the court accepts these proposals, other people from different tribes would file similar cases, challenging their customs,” noted Mihayo.
The court provided options to the petitioners to pursue their cases - submit their proposals to the district councils, which will recommend to the responsible minister to modify a certain customary law.
”If the minister accepts the proposals, he may publish them in the government gazette or make some amendments on the laws to suit public interests,” said Justice Mihayo.
But the petitioners’ counsel said the would appeal. ”We are not satisfied with the ruling; we are going to the Court of Appeal very soon,” said Alex Mgongolwa.
By Judica Tarimo, Guardian, 09/09/06
Related info/URLs:
Related information
Dossier 27: Why bring Islamic personal laws into the public space? Episodes from Tanzania
Salma Maoulidi (Published: December 2005)
This paper presents concrete scenarios showing the dilemma faced by women in plural contexts of private and public space when Muslim laws are invoked and applied to women by analysing the discussions surrounding the reforms of personal laws in Mainland Tanzania and presenting three case studies that underscore the contradictions arising from the application of dual legal systems.
http://www.wluml.org/english/pubsfulltxt.shtml?cmd[87]=i-87-531762
Dossier 27: Why bring Islamic personal laws into the public space? Episodes from Tanzania
Salma Maoulidi (Published: December 2005)
This paper presents concrete scenarios showing the dilemma faced by women in plural contexts of private and public space when Muslim laws are invoked and applied to women by analysing the discussions surrounding the reforms of personal laws in Mainland Tanzania and presenting three case studies that underscore the contradictions arising from the application of dual legal systems.
http://www.wluml.org/english/pubsfulltxt.shtml?cmd[87]=i-87-531762
Submitted on Tue, 09/12/2006 - 23:00
Related News
- Muslim women in India petition Supreme Court to end 'triple talaq’ instant divorce
- India: 'Now, men will be a bit scared to say talaq'
- Turkey court ruling on religious marriages spurs uproar
- Widows’ eviction highlights need to abolish or amend Tanzania’s discriminatory laws, UN experts say
- Algeria passes law banning violence against women
Related Actions
- Saudi Arabia: Release Maysaa Alamoudi and Loujain Alhathloul
- SIGN THE PETITION: President Hamid Karzai: We call on you not to sign the new Law on Criminal Procedures
- Egypt: Postpone the 15 December referendum on the draft Constitution!
- Women Living Under Muslim Laws Statement on Libya
- Saudi Arabia: WLUML/VNC Statement: 'We Say "Yes" to Women's Full Enjoyment of their Rights'