Bangladesh: Anti-Ahmadiyya agitation
Source:
The Daily Star - Dhaka Religious fanaticism must be countered effectively.
Religious fanatics, who have long been fomenting anti-Ahmadiyya sentiments, have again threatened the government with 'dire consequences', should it fail to evict the Ahmadiyyas from their mosque at Nakhalpara by January 3.
The threats are the words coming from a group of fanatics who do not represent the majority Muslims. But the very fact that the ultimatum has been issued, and the fanatics are making a determined bid to execute their plan of occupying the mosque, speak volumes for the inadequate government response to the movement being launched against the members of a small sect. The minister for religious affairs had assured us that the government would protect the religious rights of all citizens.
The latest ultimatum, however, gives us a different picture the fanatics are ready to swoop on a small, vulnerable community, which has been identified as non-Muslims by the aggressors. Now the question is, who has given them the authority to decide who is a Muslim and who is not? The government, we believe, has a lot to do to make sure that the religious rights of citizens are not encroached upon by any individual or group. The pure law and order approach is the solution here since the fanatics are threatening to resort to violence. However, a peaceful settlement of the issue is what people would like to see. The government should talk to the agitators and convince them that their demand goes against the spirit of Islam, democracy and the basic principles that the country is committed to.
It is often said that our image abroad will be lowered if we allow activities that smack of religious extremism. Why can't the government realise that the international community will be greatly perturbed by what the fanatics are doing in the name of serving religion? If our international image has any place on its agenda, the government can ill afford to allow anybody to disrupt religious harmony.
The latest ultimatum, however, gives us a different picture the fanatics are ready to swoop on a small, vulnerable community, which has been identified as non-Muslims by the aggressors. Now the question is, who has given them the authority to decide who is a Muslim and who is not? The government, we believe, has a lot to do to make sure that the religious rights of citizens are not encroached upon by any individual or group. The pure law and order approach is the solution here since the fanatics are threatening to resort to violence. However, a peaceful settlement of the issue is what people would like to see. The government should talk to the agitators and convince them that their demand goes against the spirit of Islam, democracy and the basic principles that the country is committed to.
It is often said that our image abroad will be lowered if we allow activities that smack of religious extremism. Why can't the government realise that the international community will be greatly perturbed by what the fanatics are doing in the name of serving religion? If our international image has any place on its agenda, the government can ill afford to allow anybody to disrupt religious harmony.
Submitted on Mon, 12/22/2003 - 00:00
Related News
- Mauritania broadens death penalty for blasphemy
- UN Special Rapporteur in Field of Cultural Rights on the Paris Attacks: “Crime against humanity, crime against culture”
- What ISIS has done to the lives of women
- Climate Change is Forcing Bangladeshi Girls into Child Marriage
- Afghan clerics uneasy as civil rights movement gains momentum
Related Actions
- Statement in Condemnation of Terrorist Attack Targeting Media Organizations in Afghanistan
- We Strongly Condemn the Terrorist Attacks Taking Place in the Name of “Islam”
- Women Living Under Muslim Laws (WLUML) condemns the harassment of Sri Lankan activist Sharmila Seyyid
- Call for Iraqi Women Victimized by ISIS
- 'Stop the extreme group of monks called Bodu Bala Sena who ignites the religious hatred, enmity and violent oppressions in Srilanka
Relevant Resources
- Promotion and protection of human rights: human rights questions, including alternative approaches for improving the effective enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms
- Special Issue: Gender and Fundamentalism
- Position Statement on Apostasy and Blasphemy
- Report of the Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief, Heiner Bielefeldt, Human Rights Council 28th Session
- Dossier 30-31: The Struggle for Secularism in Europe and North America